>This supports the view that any interview is really focused on finding a reason not to hire someone rather than finding reasons to hire them. I completely dis

>This supports the view that any interview is really focused on finding a reason not to hire someone rather than finding reasons to hire them. I completely disagree with the current interview process as it existed for the last 20+ years. Last discussion I had I came to the conclusion that big tech companies created this process to not hire domestic workers so they can use H1-B visa workers, who are much easier to control under threat of deportation. H1-B was really big in the early 2000s which is when this process really started. There is a legal requirement to hire H1-B that a company must try to find a domestic worker but were unsuccessful. This style of interview process fits that requirement perfectly. The industry just happened to cargo cult it and here we are, massively employing an interview process designed not to hire people. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/62-index-h1b https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/fact-sheets/62-index-h1b Additional requirements for H-1B-dependent or willful violator employers with LCAs filed prior to October 1, 2003 and after March 7, 2005. No displacement of a similarly employed U.S. worker beginning 90 days before and ending 90 days after the filing of an H-1B visa petition; Recruitment of U.S. workers before seeking an H-1B worker. Offer employment to an equally or better qualified U.S. applicant for the job for which H-1B workers are sought (enforced by the Department of Justice).