4 ms·

> The fact that navy and airforce just ignore it They don’t ignore it, they have an active team in pentagon constantly researching this and have also launched

> The fact that navy and airforce just ignore it They don’t ignore it, they have an active team in pentagon constantly researching this and have also launched an active taskforce to start tracking it [0] > Why are they only spotted off US coast near US carriers They are not, they have been both spotted and disclosed by US, China, Russia, France, you can look it up. > If it were aliens why are they not avoiding the only place on earth where they get spotted UAP sightings have been reported across the world since decades. Neither the navy nor the airforce ignores it, They just are quite in public, does the navy scream on tv panicking every time, something military critical happens ? [0](https://www.the-sun.com/news/4134917/pentagon-launch-ufo-task-force-probe-mysterious-aircraft/ https://www.the-sun.com/news/4134917/pentagon-launch-ufo-tas...)

me_me_me 5y ago
I am not really interested in spending time chasing ghosts, but I have an advice for you. When trying to convince someone dont include a tabloid as your source. When I see it my brain automatically moves whole conversation into trashbin
- teitoklien 5y ago
  I’m not trying to convince you, You stated certain things and I only gave counterarguments since I felt some of them were wrong/outdated in terms of current context (idc about aliens, I’m talking about the part, where you state neither navy nor airforce cares about existence of this tech) You dont have to take the word of this tabloid, pick any news site you favor and read it from there, this was featured by all major sites. If seeing a link’s fqdn makes your brain put an entire conversation into trashbin, then thats an issue of your brain, not the link. Do you always trash information featured across multiple sources just because you hate one source ? Nvm tho, Its a waste of time, all the information is laid plane in sight, what you believe in, after that is on you.

me_me_me 5y ago

I am not really interested in spending time chasing ghosts, but I have an advice for you. When trying to convince someone dont include a tabloid as your source. When I see it my brain automatically moves whole conversation into trashbin

teitoklien 5y ago
I’m not trying to convince you, You stated certain things and I only gave counterarguments since I felt some of them were wrong/outdated in terms of current context (idc about aliens, I’m talking about the part, where you state neither navy nor airforce cares about existence of this tech) You dont have to take the word of this tabloid, pick any news site you favor and read it from there, this was featured by all major sites. If seeing a link’s fqdn makes your brain put an entire conversation into trashbin, then thats an issue of your brain, not the link. Do you always trash information featured across multiple sources just because you hate one source ? Nvm tho, Its a waste of time, all the information is laid plane in sight, what you believe in, after that is on you.