4 ms·
> How is that different from a union spending their own money holding a union meeting to express their views to the employees? The company meetings are compuls
by andybak 5y ago
> How is that different from a union spending their own money holding a union meeting to express their views to the employees?
The company meetings are compulsory. The union meetings aren't.
> Or do you think workers can’t be trusted to decide what’s in their best interests if exposed to both sides of an issue?
We like to believe ourselves to be discerning, rational beings, unswayed by propaganda but study after study and the existence of the entire advertising industry provides strong evidence this is not the case.
- gruez 5y ago>The company meetings are compulsory. The union meetings aren't. Would you still object if the union could hold mandatory meetings, if they were able to pony up the cash?
- andybak 5y agoI think I'd prefer both sides offer non-mandatory meetings - your scenario is problemmatic in other ways.