Yah it seems like they're conflating high level OS'es with low level RTOS'es. Perhaps comparing their OS to a general purpose OS while doing embedded / RTOS thi

Yah it seems like they're conflating high level OS'es with low level RTOS'es. Perhaps comparing their OS to a general purpose OS while doing embedded / RTOS things. Take: > Precedence for the Hubris approach can be found in other systems like library operating systems, but there is an essential difference: Hubris is a memory-protected system, with tasks, the kernel, and drivers all in disjoint protection domains. It's great that the drivers run in a different memory domains. Still I'm not convinced this isn't that different from many RTOS'es. Zephyr RTOS which can do memory protected tasks and defines each task's stack statically.