3 ms·

>The Hunter Biden laptop from hell >the wastebin of normies circle jerking themselves off with progressive narratives and no pushback So, why aren't you using

>The Hunter Biden laptop from hell >the wastebin of normies circle jerking themselves off with progressive narratives and no pushback So, why aren't you using a six word phrase that expresses why "normies" should care about the laptop, instead of a tag that only communicates to the already initiated? I think this may be more of an impediment than "censorship". Also, it would help to put it in context with Hillary's emails. I've forgotten why those mattered.

ipspam 5y ago
Hilary Clinton had a private email server. She got shit for it. She deleted the emails so noone could read them. In order to cover up her transgressions, she accused her political opponent of doing exactly what she was doing: colluding through secret internet communications for nefarious purposes. She spent millions of dollars through several cutouts that John Durham is investigating. She colluded with the Russians to frame Trump for colluding with the Russians. She got her revenge and special council against him. Meanwhile, a disgruntled staffer likely stole DNC "stuff" and maybe fed it to WikiLeaks. The DNC knew. In order to combat this knowing it would drop as an October surprise, they made a fake hacking claim up and blamed it on the Russians. Confused? Hilary colluded with Russians while blaming Russians and Trump? Yep. And the emails are important because they would have shown the same level of corruption seen in hunter Biden's emails. Hunter Biden's laptop was soaked with liquid while hunter was doing drugs. He took it to be repaired and never picked it up. The repair shop was owed compensation, and eventually the laptop became that compensation. Legally. In order to counter the heat about Joe Biden and Hunter Bidens shady business dealing in Ukraine, they accused their opponents of shady dealing in the Ukraine. This was the impeachment scandal that revolved around Colonel Vindmans "whistleblower" complaint. They tainted the waters so greatly with politics that there was no way to wade through the mess and hold Hunter or Joe to account. They accused Trump of their corruption in Ukraine. The playbook is accuse your opponents of your crimes.
- perl4ever 5y ago
  >they would have shown the same level of corruption Would have? Meaning the emails were not released? >colluded with Russians >the same level of corruption >shady business dealing >tainted the waters so greatly with politics >their corruption in Ukraine These are all perfectly generic accusations. My point is, you need a sound bite or slogan that is not generic. That evokes something specific, and a context. If you don't care, why bother saying anything? >The playbook is accuse your opponents of your crimes. Yes, it is. How do you, and how should we, tell the difference between two sides accusing each other in similar terms?

ipspam 5y ago

Hilary Clinton had a private email server. She got shit for it. She deleted the emails so noone could read them. In order to cover up her transgressions, she accused her political opponent of doing exactly what she was doing: colluding through secret internet communications for nefarious purposes. She spent millions of dollars through several cutouts that John Durham is investigating. She colluded with the Russians to frame Trump for colluding with the Russians. She got her revenge and special council against him. Meanwhile, a disgruntled staffer likely stole DNC "stuff" and maybe fed it to WikiLeaks. The DNC knew. In order to combat this knowing it would drop as an October surprise, they made a fake hacking claim up and blamed it on the Russians. Confused? Hilary colluded with Russians while blaming Russians and Trump? Yep. And the emails are important because they would have shown the same level of corruption seen in hunter Biden's emails. Hunter Biden's laptop was soaked with liquid while hunter was doing drugs. He took it to be repaired and never picked it up. The repair shop was owed compensation, and eventually the laptop became that compensation. Legally. In order to counter the heat about Joe Biden and Hunter Bidens shady business dealing in Ukraine, they accused their opponents of shady dealing in the Ukraine. This was the impeachment scandal that revolved around Colonel Vindmans "whistleblower" complaint. They tainted the waters so greatly with politics that there was no way to wade through the mess and hold Hunter or Joe to account. They accused Trump of their corruption in Ukraine. The playbook is accuse your opponents of your crimes.

perl4ever 5y ago
>they would have shown the same level of corruption Would have? Meaning the emails were not released? >colluded with Russians >the same level of corruption >shady business dealing >tainted the waters so greatly with politics >their corruption in Ukraine These are all perfectly generic accusations. My point is, you need a sound bite or slogan that is not generic. That evokes something specific, and a context. If you don't care, why bother saying anything? >The playbook is accuse your opponents of your crimes. Yes, it is. How do you, and how should we, tell the difference between two sides accusing each other in similar terms?