3 ms·
I think it's inappropriate to speculate on what "good" someone is contributing to the world, period. So much of it is determined by intentions, plans, and time
by aik 15y ago
I think it's inappropriate to speculate on what "good" someone is contributing to the world, period. So much of it is determined by intentions, plans, and time -- these are things that are invisible to everyone but the individual.
Instead worry about your own contributions, don't try to determine what to give based on expectations you draw from observing others (or try to force this thinking upon others) -- it's unlikely your choice will be anywhere near the truth, and it skews the act from one of generosity into one of keeping up with social standards ("keeping up with the Joneses" sort of thing).
- bradleyland 15y agoReflecting on the decisions of others is an important component of human cultural development. Alone, we all have limited experience. We can't possibly match the diversity and reach of the outcomes resulting from decisions made by everyone around us. Reflecting on Steve Jobs' decision to abstain from philanthropy is an important cultural point of discussion. Asking what "good" Mr. Jobs has contributed to the world is a question that should be approached with an open mind. The objectivist would look at his actions and hold them up as an example of a shared positive outcome resulting from self-motivated action. By Mr. Jobs' relentless focus on advancing Apple, we have all enjoyed the benefit of the many devices that were brought to market by Apple under his leadership. That's just one perspective though. It may not hold up under scrutiny, but we owe it to ourselves to ask the question: Is philanthropy the best and only way?