3 ms·
> Related: Is there some option I can pass to make it clear that the data on the server will never change and thus no possible write-to-read or close-to-open co
by geertj 5y ago
> Related: Is there some option I can pass to make it clear that the data on the server will never change and thus no possible write-to-read or close-to-open consistency issues can arise?
As far as I know the NFS client does not support such a mount option today. I should have mentioned this, but there /is/ a way to eliminate the 'close to open' cache check for repeated open() operations, which is to use NFS delegations. NFS read delegations are supported by both nfsd and the NFS client. They are not perfect, as they are best effort, but can typically keep the core data set of your workload fully local. This would not work for your first build but would work for the second.
> Interesting! I've never seen the per-flow limit mentioned before. Is that documented somewhere?
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ec2-instance-network-bandwidth.html https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ec2-inst...