4 ms·
No disagreement with me there, the copyright laws are a disaster and have long lost their way from the 'means' to "promote the Progress of Science and useful Ar
by gonehome 5y ago
No disagreement with me there, the copyright laws are a disaster and have long lost their way from the 'means' to "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."
The purpose is to incentivize creative works for the public benefit with the limited time exclusive rights, not retroactively extend copyright years after the death of the author to enrich their rights-holders in perpetuity every time expiration comes up.
As it is, you can't even make something public domain yourself - the best you can do is add a permissive license since all rights are reserved by default without registration.
But this is getting somewhat off topic.
- M2Ys4U 5y agoCopyright has always been a means of control by publishers, stretching right back to mid 1600s. The specific wording of the US constitution was (is?) a nice little bit of fluff but it didn't really change the nature of copyright at all when it was published.