I strongly oppose all types, but the symbolic pin-prick variant that is practiced in some places seems to me to be far less of a "mutilation" than ordinary male

I strongly oppose all types, but the symbolic pin-prick variant that is practiced in some places seems to me to be far less of a "mutilation" than ordinary male circumcision. And yet it is considered "female genital mutilation". Now I think that we can all agree that the worst types of FGM are completely deserving of the term mutilation, but it has always struck me as a very double standard that a pin prick that has probably healed completely in a few days is called a mutilation, but literally cutting off a large part of the foreskin, leaving a permanent scar, is not.