3 ms·
> the likelihood of any of these things actually becoming a problem decreases significantly as you read through the paragraph. And yet, "likelihood" doesn't ne
by inetknght 5y ago
> the likelihood of any of these things actually becoming a problem decreases significantly as you read through the paragraph.
And yet, "likelihood" doesn't necessarily mean "hasn't been done".
Just look at:
* [0]: Intel ME
* [1]: Solarwinds attack and CI systems
* [2]: Ubiquiti attack and complete infrastructure compromise
* [3]: And the famous Ken Thompson statement
[0a]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15298833 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15298833
[0b]: https://www.blackhat.com/eu-17/briefings/schedule/#how-to-hack-a-turned-off-computer-or-running-unsigned-code-in-intel-management-engine-8668 https://www.blackhat.com/eu-17/briefings/schedule/#how-to-ha...
[1]: https://www.cisecurity.org/solarwinds/ https://www.cisecurity.org/solarwinds/
[2]: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/04/ubiquiti-all-but-confirms-breach-response-iniquity/ https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/04/ubiquiti-all-but-confirm...
[3]: https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thompson.pdf https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-tho...
- michaelmior 5y agoIndeed. I mentioned those specific things because it has been done. However, I think the likelihood of the average user being affected by things near the end of the list is generally quite small. If we aren't willing to accept this, at some point, we can't use technology for anything important.