6 ms·

This is the kind of active truth reengineering that brought us here in the first place. You are the one pushing a narrative about protesters with your framing

This is the kind of active truth reengineering that brought us here in the first place. You are the one pushing a narrative about protesters with your framing and language. Much edgy media such as the Jan 6 protester exclaiming it was a revolution are clearly compliant with this rule despite its breadth. Perhaps more focus on raw truth and what people agree to share would be better than all the heavy interpretation up front?

StanislavPetrov 5y ago
>You are the one pushing a narrative about protesters with your framing and language. The narrative I'm pushing is one of transparency. There is no "clear compliance" with this rule because it is deliberately vague and open to the interpretation of Twitter censors - and that is the problem. As written it very clearly delegates the power to Twitter moderators to pick and choose what raw images and videos people will be allowed to see based on no specific metrics at all. The clear fact is that the powers-that-be have lost control over the narrative and desperately want to return to the age when everyone got the same, curated message from ABC, CBS and NBC. From the Bay of Tonkin to WMD to Russiagate, more disinformation and lies has been distributed by the government and the corporate media than all the Qanon shamans and 4Chan basement dwellers combined. These are the people who now claim that they need to impose mass censorship across all major platforms to combat, "disinformation".