4 ms·
Why is this news? The 3.0 kernel could very well have been called 2.6.40, would that have been news worthy?
by helper 15y ago
Why is this news? The 3.0 kernel could very well have been called 2.6.40, would that have been news worthy?
- gtaylor 15y agoBecause Arch had to make some changes due to assumptions on their end, w.r.t kernel naming scheme. This is part of the breakage that the article mentions.
- Ideka 15y agoAlso note that Arch is a rolling-release OS. The lastest iso (previous to the linux 3.0 one) was released on june/july last year -- that's 15 months ago.