4 ms·
My takeaway from this is: you think your company is great. No other information was transferred to me in this article. I learned nothing about FIO, libnfs, NFS
by fefe23 5y ago
My takeaway from this is: you think your company is great.
No other information was transferred to me in this article.
I learned nothing about FIO, libnfs, NFS, or your patch.
No feature comparison with other efforts.
No benchmark comparison with other efforts.
I wasted my time here.
- guenthert 5y agoHmmh, there might be room for improvement, but I appreciate the article and the link here to it. It's been a while that I tried to get the most out of a NFS server and was unaware that it is still used for high performance applications. 25GB/s surely impressed me.
- stingraycharles 5y agoAs someone who recently spent two months trying to squeeze the highest perf out of a 160GBit NFS cluster, I’d say the article lacks a _lot_ of detail. But it’s good to know there are ways to get much more perf out of it.
- tarasglek 5y agoYeah this whole process took 2 years in-between usual work. This article was testing the waters to see if people are interested and for direction where to focus followup articles. Future areas of focus could be: diving into modern numa architecture, how to set expectations of hw perf limits, network architecture, pros/cons of S3 vs object in terms of perf.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- packetslave 5y agoSix sentences and you managed to mention yourself 5 times. Do better.
- lma21 5y agoWhat he said was not wrong. Why do better? I also wasted my time and learned nothing about how they achieved 25 GB/s with NFS. What were the bottlenecks? What did they fine tune? Was a plug-and-play type of benchmark?