None of the charts seem to take into account any absorption at all, regardless of the duration. Having a chart 120 years long, and not including absorption, me

None of the charts seem to take into account any absorption at all, regardless of the duration. Having a chart 120 years long, and not including absorption, means all the numbers are significantly wrong. Also, 120 years is on the upper range of most estimates, and does not assume any increased absorption despite the fact that we've almost doubled the concentration of CO2.