3 ms·

This time Amazon will be sure not to engage in intimidation. That you can prove.

• woodruffw 5y ago
  Amazon is certain to engage in the kinds of intimidation that they're legally allowed to perform: anti-union agitprop and vague gesticulation about economic uncertainty. But hopefully the threat of continued elections will make them a little more hesitant when it comes to cheeky things like "the ballot box will be in a room controlled by Amazon, with Amazon-monitored cameras pointing at you as you arrive[1]." But only time will tell. [1]: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/19/amazon-prevented-free-and-fair-election-in-alabama-union-alleges.html https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/19/amazon-prevented-free-and-fa...
  • sjg007 5y ago
    Amazon would be able to actually infer the votes from this type of scheme.
  • vadfa 5y ago
    Both sides engage in the same information war.
    • jjar 5y ago
      Only one side is worth literal billions, and has no qualms about spending those billions to win.
    • woodruffw 5y ago
      Of course they do, it's a labor dispute. What's the point of this comment, other than a vague "both sides, therefore bad" statement?
  • TheCoelacanth 5y ago
    If the only punishment for getting caught is a do over, they are 100% guaranteed to continue preventing a fair election.
• ErikVandeWater 5y ago
  If they did already engage in intimidation, there's no undoing it.