You don't need new evidence to come to a new understanding of policy measures. We were worried about supply chains, and then we weren't. In a supply chain con

You don't need new evidence to come to a new understanding of policy measures. We were worried about supply chains, and then we weren't. In a supply chain constraint, Doctors get masks, because they need them. Beyond that, the general population for whom masks are marginally useful, can have them. Because 'masks are a policy' then we have to wear them in certain environments with strict oversight, I think this has led some people to believe that they are some kind if 'important tool' when of course they are not, they're just a small measure, but an important one in the aggregate. The author is perfectly within his rights to be curmudgeon, but he's not very reasonable in his argumentation, he's more or less venting and name calling, which is unfortunately the reality of most of the anti-vaxx populism: there are very few well orchestrated skeptic arguments.