3 ms·
If it was part of a font, then I would think that the logo was in vector form. (It could have been a bitmap font, of course, but if you're sending the font to m
by chriscjcj 5y ago
If it was part of a font, then I would think that the logo was in vector form. (It could have been a bitmap font, of course, but if you're sending the font to magazines and publishers, a postscript or TueType font would have been more appropriate.) If it did exist in the font as a vector based image, it seems strange to upload a rasterized version to archive.org. It wouldn't have been too hard to upload it as an svg or eps and maintain its quality regardless of its size/resolution.
- pavon 5y agoThe article says the Mac version was a bmapfile which is a rasterized image format, not vector form. That said, they really should have uploaded the original files to archive.org, in addition to the conversion to a more common format.