3 ms·
Appreciate the thoughtful reply! Lots of what you said resonates and is what I've done, so I'm happy to see some of that validation. Having been on the interv
by brayhite 5y ago
Appreciate the thoughtful reply!
Lots of what you said resonates and is what I've done, so I'm happy to see some of that validation.
Having been on the interview end of things a handful of times, I 100% agree on the two-way street analogy. I've somewhat prided myself for at least trying to make interviews conversational, both because it seems to organically bring about more interesting (and relevant) parts about their job history, but also because it's a way for myself and the interviewee to get a feel for the professional culture.
That said, having not interviewed for a job in nearly a decade, I have little idea if that's the norm. Especially given how much "resume" and "interview" training from school was centered around spinning negatives into positives and glowing up a job history, both conflicting with the organic, and maybe too transparent style or resume and interviewing I gravitate towards.
Thanks for the reply and the assurance I'm not too far off track :)
- donkeyd 5y ago> I have little idea if that's the norm. > style or resume and interviewing I gravitate towards. If that's what you gravitate towards, to me that seems like an incredibly good benchmark for your cultural fit from your side. > spinning negatives into positives and glowing up a job history, both conflicting Don't confuse 'glowing up your job history' with lying about your experience though. Many people under sell their job history, because things you do every day become normal to you. So people often actually need to 'glow up' their job history in order to not under sell themselves.