4 ms·
Yes! Of course it is, but employment is a market like anything else. The difference between $175K and market rate compensation (which may be significantly high
by oxidethrowaway 5y ago
Yes! Of course it is, but employment is a market like anything else.
The difference between $175K and market rate compensation (which may be significantly higher right now, considering the job market and the skills they’re asking for) is captured entirely by the founders and investors. We shouldn’t be shaming people for expecting a higher portion of the value they create in a competitive market like this.
But the fixed salary method creates a lot of secondary problems for a company: It can become a revolving door as people join for quick experience and resume-building, but then leave as soon as they can get a higher paying job somewhere else.
- nextaccountic 5y ago> The difference between $175K and market rate compensation (which may be significantly higher right now, considering the job market and the skills they’re asking for) is captured entirely by the founders and investors Why wouldn't some % of this be captured by your teammates?
- oxidethrowaway 5y agoThat’s why I asked about equity. If they’re giving significant equity then I have no problems with the $175K compensation limit. One of my favorite employers right out of college did almost exactly this same thing: Everyone gets paid the same (although they had a couple tiers) and a lot of talk about how we’re all equal. I believed it, until the acquisition event and I realized that the founders and early team members literally had 100-1000X or more as much equity than I did. All of the talk about paying everyone the same suddenly seemed like a cruel joke.