3 ms·
I'm not 100% sure, but it looks like 9 out of 64, which is a larger percentage than normal. I doubt it's due to growth though; it's probably just a fluke. (Th
by pg 15y ago
I'm not 100% sure, but it looks like 9 out of 64, which is a larger percentage than normal. I doubt it's due to growth though; it's probably just a fluke.
(The reason it's 64 and not 63 is that two of the startups in this batch merged part way through.)