4 ms·
CUDA is what ended up replacing it, or rather, OpenCL had always failed to make a dent over the long term. (with AMD ROCm being a CUDA API clone, without the P
by my123 5y ago
CUDA is what ended up replacing it, or rather, OpenCL had always failed to make a dent over the long term.
(with AMD ROCm being a CUDA API clone, without the PTX layer)
- DeathArrow 5y agoBut is there anyone using ROCm in production? Is ROCm up to par with CUDA?
- my123 5y agoNo. It isn’t up to par. But that’s AMD’s problem. No standard spec would solve a lack of software development investment of a hardware vendor, especially for a device as complex as a GPU. (meanwhile, on the Intel side, oneAPI looks to be very serviceable, but has a problem for now: where is the fast hardware to run it on?)