4 ms·

Props for attaching your name to your comment, something I wish the throwaway OP also did, though in the spirit of believing the victim, I can understand why th

Props for attaching your name to your comment, something I wish the throwaway OP also did, though in the spirit of believing the victim, I can understand why they didn't. That said, with threads like this, there's also value in letting people come forward with their experiences (positive or otherwise) to see if there's any sort of pattern; any such patterns can then inform future interactions with the people or companies involved. My own personal experience over the last year as a manager of managers that may be relevant to both pc and barmstrong: seeing a surprising number of security resumes on the market from current Stripe talent suggests there may be a bit of impending brain drain (for reasons I can't put a finger on as I'm not inside). I've seen less of this with Coinbase talent.

luckydata 5y ago
there ABSOLUTELY is a pattern of Stripe doing this stuff.
leephillips 5y ago
"in the spirit of believing the victim" The only kind of sense this could make is as a tautology. If the commenter is a "victim" then you've already decided to believe him or her. But what evidence do you have to support this belief?
- eganist 5y ago
  worth noting that the parent comment was flagged to death 4 minutes after posting and vouched what, a half hour later? Anyway, I sent this to the comment author via email, but the best I can do in public is link to https://www.blackburncenter.org/post/on-believing-victims https://www.blackburncenter.org/post/on-believing-victims Context: I run r/Relationship Advice.
  - rightbyte 5y ago
    Oh. I thought "hey, why are you not greyed out then?" but that would explain it.
- Gene_Parmesan 5y ago
  I don't see the tautology. The point is, when someone claims they are a "victim" (I would agree the term is only a loose fit here), we believe them. The whole point of the statement is to not demand evidence. Obviously we're not talking about the legal system here. I do think this whole idea has minimal relevance to the thread as I really don't think the PC qualifies as a victim. Just wanted to clarify the idea of "believe the victim" as it's extremely important in potential cases of sexual assault (which, again, not relevant here).
  - throwbigdata 5y ago
    And abused as well

luckydata 5y ago

there ABSOLUTELY is a pattern of Stripe doing this stuff.

leephillips 5y ago

"in the spirit of believing the victim" The only kind of sense this could make is as a tautology. If the commenter is a "victim" then you've already decided to believe him or her. But what evidence do you have to support this belief?

eganist 5y ago
worth noting that the parent comment was flagged to death 4 minutes after posting and vouched what, a half hour later? Anyway, I sent this to the comment author via email, but the best I can do in public is link to https://www.blackburncenter.org/post/on-believing-victims https://www.blackburncenter.org/post/on-believing-victims Context: I run r/Relationship Advice.
- rightbyte 5y ago
  Oh. I thought "hey, why are you not greyed out then?" but that would explain it.
Gene_Parmesan 5y ago
I don't see the tautology. The point is, when someone claims they are a "victim" (I would agree the term is only a loose fit here), we believe them. The whole point of the statement is to not demand evidence. Obviously we're not talking about the legal system here. I do think this whole idea has minimal relevance to the thread as I really don't think the PC qualifies as a victim. Just wanted to clarify the idea of "believe the victim" as it's extremely important in potential cases of sexual assault (which, again, not relevant here).
- throwbigdata 5y ago
  And abused as well