4 ms·

This is a real problem, and a direct consequence of elite competition: keep other competitors out. There should be enough places to live built as there are hum

• eru 5y ago
  Have a look at 'Why are there NIMBYs?' (Eg http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.981.2856&rep=rep1&type=pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.981... ) I wouldn't exactly call your typical middle class home owner an elite. Would you? > There should be enough places to live built as there are humans. We have the technology to build high and stack apartments, and the wealth to afford it. In many places, we just don't have the regulatory environment to do so legally.
  • pfkurtz 5y ago
    Yes NIMBY is a problem and may be more about human nature. The broken regulatory environment that exacerbates the problem is a consequence of elite competition: government not working for the public is caused by being captured by narrow interests, who work to corrupt its purpose. The (upper) middle class homeowners who don't want apartments built nearby? They are, for various reasons, better represented by local governments than people who want to do new things. I agree that the concept of "elite" doesn't cover what's going on here, but there are echoes, because power is a spectrum. That's the point I actually wanted to make.
    • eru 5y ago
      > The broken regulatory environment that exacerbates the problem is a consequence of elite competition: government not working for the public is caused by being captured by narrow interests, who work to corrupt its purpose. Alas, not necessarily. Normal voters are perfectly capable of demanding broken stuff all by themselves. Voters (somewhat rationally!) behave like idiots.