I don't think it applies strictly to contracts of adhesion, just contracts where a single party was the drafter of the bad term. This case will not hinge on wh

I don't think it applies strictly to contracts of adhesion, just contracts where a single party was the drafter of the bad term. This case will not hinge on what the definition of "evil" is, but on whether "don't be evil" was a real term of the contract or some errata in the employee handbook. And even then, the complaint isn't "Google was evil" but rather "Google's handbook said to point out evil when I see it and they fired me for it".