I would for the sake of argument stipulate that "evil" means something, that a court might be able to adjudicate it, and that CBP does many specific things whic

I would for the sake of argument stipulate that "evil" means something, that a court might be able to adjudicate it, and that CBP does many specific things which might be deemed evil. However, even given all of that, I do not believe it is possible for Google to exist without being complicit with the overall purpose of CBP. I don't see any particularly salient dividing line between generically working with them and not. There might be something evil about the details of the particular project, but if CBP as a whole is evil, I don't comprehend how working with them automatically makes a difference when you are based in the US anyway. I can swallow "a US court adjudicating which acts are evil" much easier than "a US court adjudicating which major parts of the US government are generally evil". The latter seems like some sort of propaganda fantasy, a snake eating its tail.