5 ms·

I think the ribbon concept is inherently flawed because no human brain can remember such an overwhelming amount of information (what command in which function g

by kaishin 15y ago

I think the ribbon concept is inherently flawed because no human brain can remember such an overwhelming amount of information (what command in which function group in which tab).

whatusername 15y ago
And your suggestion is? How is the ribbon any different to a hierarchial menu bar? (See the Gnome drop-down menu or the iOS Settings Menu).
- revscat 15y ago
  Limit the need for Explorer/Finder/etc. altogether. For those cases where it is needed limit top level UI elements to the most commonly used items. Move the rest to either a toolbar or a contextual menu. You know, I just checked Finder and realized that not only does it not have the things showed in this mockup, but that I have never missed them. Strange.
  - cytzol 15y ago
    Did you consider that you haven't missed these things because you aren't used to using them?
    - revscat 15y ago
      No, I don't think so. Every function given by this ribbon is available in Finder without buttons. I can give you the steps, if you'd like.
      - cytzol 15y ago
        If you have to give me steps, then I think you've missed the point of the Ribbon! The Finder has a lot of places you can perform operations on a file: the menu bar, the toolbar, the Get Info inspector, and the context menu. All the Ribbon does is turn them into buttons and put them in the same place. There's no remembering how to do stuff - and yes, some people can't remember how to do basic file management - because it's all done from the same row at the top. I could say the same thing about "Every function in the Finder I can do without having to use menus".
      - untog 15y ago
        If you have to explain steps to me then it isn't working like MS are discussing here. The whole point is that no-one needs to give you steps.
- kaishin 15y ago
  The problem has more to do with the excessive number of available commands. My suggestion is to cut the clutter and avoid hierarchical UI elements altogether, regardless of their nature.
  - dpark 15y ago
    So we're limited to either only exposing a dozen operations or somehow shoving 200 operations into a flat UI? This seems to be rather unrealistic.
    - kaishin 15y ago
      A dozen operations may be more than enough for 80% of users. Designing for the remaining 20% is a common UI design mistake.
      - dpark 15y ago
        So basically the rest of the operations simply cannot exist? I guess you'll never burn another disk, or create a new folder for that matter.
hackinthebochs 15y ago
You don't remember it, you develop muscle memory. I couldn't tell you what most key combinations are in Visual studio, but I'm always able to press the right buttons in the right context.

by kaishin 15y ago

I think the ribbon concept is inherently flawed because no human brain can remember such an overwhelming amount of information (what command in which function group in which tab).

whatusername 15y ago

And your suggestion is? How is the ribbon any different to a hierarchial menu bar? (See the Gnome drop-down menu or the iOS Settings Menu).

revscat 15y ago
Limit the need for Explorer/Finder/etc. altogether. For those cases where it is needed limit top level UI elements to the most commonly used items. Move the rest to either a toolbar or a contextual menu. You know, I just checked Finder and realized that not only does it not have the things showed in this mockup, but that I have never missed them. Strange.
- cytzol 15y ago
  Did you consider that you haven't missed these things because you aren't used to using them?
  - revscat 15y ago
    No, I don't think so. Every function given by this ribbon is available in Finder without buttons. I can give you the steps, if you'd like.
    - cytzol 15y ago
      If you have to give me steps, then I think you've missed the point of the Ribbon! The Finder has a lot of places you can perform operations on a file: the menu bar, the toolbar, the Get Info inspector, and the context menu. All the Ribbon does is turn them into buttons and put them in the same place. There's no remembering how to do stuff - and yes, some people can't remember how to do basic file management - because it's all done from the same row at the top. I could say the same thing about "Every function in the Finder I can do without having to use menus".
    - untog 15y ago
      If you have to explain steps to me then it isn't working like MS are discussing here. The whole point is that no-one needs to give you steps.
kaishin 15y ago
The problem has more to do with the excessive number of available commands. My suggestion is to cut the clutter and avoid hierarchical UI elements altogether, regardless of their nature.
- dpark 15y ago
  So we're limited to either only exposing a dozen operations or somehow shoving 200 operations into a flat UI? This seems to be rather unrealistic.
  - kaishin 15y ago
    A dozen operations may be more than enough for 80% of users. Designing for the remaining 20% is a common UI design mistake.
    - dpark 15y ago
      So basically the rest of the operations simply cannot exist? I guess you'll never burn another disk, or create a new folder for that matter.

hackinthebochs 15y ago

You don't remember it, you develop muscle memory. I couldn't tell you what most key combinations are in Visual studio, but I'm always able to press the right buttons in the right context.