There would be support to outlaw adversarial attacks towards self-driving cars. As other posters have suggested it probably already is illegal, or is a narrow e

There would be support to outlaw adversarial attacks towards self-driving cars. As other posters have suggested it probably already is illegal, or is a narrow expansion of scope for existing laws. >We can try to make them hard to make, hard to posses anonymously, and hard to deliver. To stretch your own analogy, I have a wide selection of poisons at home. Except we call them cleaning products, insecticide and automobile fluids. You can get public support against adversarial attacks on self-driving. Except the main use case for computer vision is passive surveillance. Good luck on that front. Oh, and just for funzies, I'll point out the irony that some of the people building CV surveillance systems would post on HN that regardless of regulation it'll exist no matter what the government wants. The argument was that it'd be so hard for the government to control CV surveillance, that law wouldn't prevent business from creating and using it anyway. When it comes to adversarial attacks, it seems more likely to involve actions of private individuals rather than businesses, and businesses minimize legal risk in a way individual citizens don't.