3 ms·
Lol, how do you head an institute at Oxford while being so clueless about the relevant subject matter? This stuff is good emotion-grabbing speculation, but it h
by heyitsguay 5y ago
Lol, how do you head an institute at Oxford while being so clueless about the relevant subject matter? This stuff is good emotion-grabbing speculation, but it has no bearing on developments in the real-world field of artificial intelligence. Replace "AI" with "fancy regression" and see how serious these claims sound.
To be clear, there are serious ethical concerns and threats to human life associated with modern AI, but they have to do with technology shifting the balances of power between groups of humans (country vs. country, in-group vs. out-group), not superintelligent Terminators hiding nerve gas in your shoes.
- netizen-936824 5y agoThat's what you get when you listen to philosophers. They seem to have a dislike of evidence for backing up their claims
- heyitsguay 5y agoThat's probably a bit broad - there are good philosophers doing good work in the world, this just might not be one of those cases.