3 ms·
> None of Geerts papers are peer reviewed or based on scientific research/data. They have an extensive list of peer reviewed studies from plenty of other scien
by DeusExMachina 5y ago
> None of Geerts papers are peer reviewed or based on scientific research/data.
They have an extensive list of peer reviewed studies from plenty of other scientists:
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/blog/supportive-references-from-literature https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/blog/supportive...
- supernovae 5y agoGo read all those papers, none of them support the claims that the vaccination accelerates or causes mutation. It's unfortunate scientists love to stake a claim on trying to win a huge argument when they can't see the forrest from the trees and they exclude as much evidence as they cherry pick. We've defeated things before with immunization. No one ran around saying get the whooping caugh because if you get a shot it will mutate...
- DeusExMachina 5y ago> none of them support the claims that the vaccination accelerates or causes mutation. Says who? Vanden Bossche has been a credentialed expert in vaccines for 20 years. I'll take his opinion over some HN comment. > No one ran around saying get the whooping caugh because if you get a shot it will mutate That was never his argument.