> Never ascribe to malice, that which is adequately explained by incentive structuring. Incentives sounds exactly like what the person you're responding to des

> Never ascribe to malice, that which is adequately explained by incentive structuring. Incentives sounds exactly like what the person you're responding to described. Malice, on the other hand, doesn't show up at all in what they wrote. It seems weird to introduce some element to the discussion yourself, and then work so hard to explain why an explanation that depends on that element is the wrong answer. It amounts to a sort of elaborate and roundabout strawman.