This is a fairly poor article. I can't take seriously anything that notes US copyright was increased primarily to reach some form of life+70 and then claims th

This is a fairly poor article. I can't take seriously anything that notes US copyright was increased primarily to reach some form of life+70 and then claims that Disney was responsible, not mentioning it's that exact number because the US had already agreed to it in international treaty negotiations because it's was the duration of copyright in Germany. It's US centrism gone wild.