3 ms·
I agree with this opinion. When Chrome came out, it was way better. Now I don't really see big difference in performance, they have similar extensions, frequen
by Jnr 5y ago
I agree with this opinion.
When Chrome came out, it was way better. Now I don't really see big difference in performance, they have similar extensions, frequent updates, sync, etc.
I prefer Firefox but I don't really need to install it on family computers because whatever browser they use is probably good enough.
- generalizations 5y agoI recently moved back to chromium from Firefox. FF tended to waste a lot more cpu; and, I tend not to restart my machines for days on end, and those memory leaks were killer. Chromium is just much better built.
- muxator 5y agoFirefox sync and Chrome sync came out about the same time if I remember correctly. The first release was in Firefox 4.0, but Mozilla Weave (the addon that eventually developed into the first version of Firefox Sync) existed since 2007, before Chrome's first release. An old Ars Technica article comparing the two protocols (much has changed since then): https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/10/ars-examines-chrome-and-firefox-bookmark-sync-protocols/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2010/10/ars-e...