3 ms·
No. Most of the piracy sites that are public and well known are super scummy. That is because only that kind of scummy income can protect and justify the exposu
by superkuh 5y ago
No. Most of the piracy sites that are public and well known are super scummy. That is because only that kind of scummy income can protect and justify the exposure. Semi-private and private piracy sites are really nice, safe, and have better organization and UI than most big money for profit sites that attempt to distribute the same types of media. What.cd was way less scummy than any large commercial media distribution company.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- kmeisthax 5y agoYes, but there's no guarantee that What.cd[0] remains a charismatic defendant in any scenario where they don't get shut down. Nor should the law be written around protecting charismatic defendants. The argument against copyright maximalism should not be made on the basis that "nice" pirate sites can exist - in fact, you should advocate for copyright reform or reduction on the basis of the least tolerable, most scummy site that should be allowed to exist. [0] insert any other non-scummy pirate site here