4 ms·
This article is complete FUD. > of which the following sources are considered to be renewable in other words, it attempts to define the world "renewable" alon
by tomp 5y ago
This article is complete FUD.
> of which the following sources are considered to be renewable
in other words, it attempts to define the world "renewable" along favoured political ideologies.
From Wikipedia:
> Advances in breeder reactor technology could allow the current reserves of uranium to provide power for humanity for billions of years, thus making nuclear power a sustainable energy
TL;DR: nuclear is just as renewable as solar (beyond any likely duration of the human civilisation).
- arcticbull 5y agoI saw the renewability as more of a thought exercise, because I agree with you, there's more than enough nuclear feedstock to keep us going indefinitely.