> all the articles I see posted around it appear to intentionally avoid specifics That's because the specifics of whatever shitty thing someone on the core tea

> all the articles I see posted around it appear to intentionally avoid specifics That's because the specifics of whatever shitty thing someone on the core team may have done are irrelevant. The issue raised by the moderation team is about structures and processes: the fact that the core team [isn't | doesn't see itself as being] under the purview of the moderation team. That problem would be the same whatever shitty thing whoever on the core team did, so those details just don't matter.