What is the worth of getting "conservative opinions" published if they are based on a make-believe fantasy that has nothing to do whatsoever with the actual rea

What is the worth of getting "conservative opinions" published if they are based on a make-believe fantasy that has nothing to do whatsoever with the actual reality at hand, disregards scientific consensus and whose primary purpose is to foster outrage and anger at a straw-man boogieman? I mean, just take the story at hand? What's the intent behind an obvious outrage piece like this? While the Spectator is definitely is not the worst offender, it's factual reporting has been declining for years. If you want conservative opinion pieces that are better grounded in reality check out https://www.thetimes.co.uk/ https://www.thetimes.co.uk/