3 ms·
The article was obviously posted here for that reason. Why else would they post a 20 year old article here?
by peakaboo 5y ago
The article was obviously posted here for that reason. Why else would they post a 20 year old article here?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- bookofjoe 5y agoI posted the article because the title caught my attention. Only after I looked more closely it did I realize it was published in 2001. I considered deleting the post until I read the article and saw that it was a PROSPECTIVE study. As a long-time medical researcher and author (https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=5DdrMc8AAAAJ&hl=en https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=5DdrMc8AAAAJ&hl=en), I know how much more likely to be valid are results from prospective rather than retrospective series.
- peakaboo 5y agoThank you for explaining.
- pmarreck 5y agoTo point out that this is nothing new, in order to discredit the conspiracy theorists
- incrudible 5y ago[flagged]