10 ms·
The article seems to ask how to define a referential term without using reference (i.e. left/right, up/down, clockwise/anti-clockwise, without reference to a st
by nopassrecover 15y ago
The article seems to ask how to define a referential term without using reference (i.e. left/right, up/down, clockwise/anti-clockwise, without reference to a static point). Using the example of radio waves, if I wanted to express a basic kind of reference I would start by using pitch (e.g. low pitches to high).
For direction (left vs right), I would broadcast a "beam", increasing in strength on one side, so hopefully an intelligent enough civilization could measure that from "left" to "right" the beam got stronger, perhaps again using pitch to help guide. The problem then would be conveying whether they should follow the broadcast "left to right" or the received "left to right" (i.e. imagine someone holding up their left hand, do they mean your left hand, as in match them, or your right hand, as in mirror them).
- crististm 15y agoExactly. How do you teach children left from right? "Left" and "right" are arbitrary names for a position relative to where the heart is. You have to point to it. It's the same as teaching the difference between "tomorrow" and "yesterday".
- jessriedel 15y agoThere's a huge difference between tomorrow and yesterday! We can define yesterday as the stuff we can remember, and tomorrow as the stuff we can't. (Time asymmetry is huge.) But without common observation (or an appeal to parity violation in the weak force) there is no way to similarly define left and right.