3 ms·
Exactly, so the point is that any relevant gestures must be coming from the timing used in an existing video, the current deepfake tech can manipulate lips and
by PeterisP 5y ago
Exactly, so the point is that any relevant gestures must be coming from the timing used in an existing video, the current deepfake tech can manipulate lips and facial expressions, but it can't have the video lift three fingers at the proper time when "300" is being said.
So this is either an indication of a very elaborate deepfake which managed to surface an amazingly coincidental source video (which should be possible to find on her archives) or that it's not a deepfake but a real recording.
- jhardy54 5y agoOr: it’s a deepfake where the attacker made a video and attached the victims face in post-processing.
- harperlee 5y agoOr: the base video is well chosen among the victim’s, the message is crafted as to not deviate a lot from the base, and the deep fake is used to have him say other things.