That’s a very opinionated view from someone who’s actually read the book. I thought the whole thing was about having a plan, and many well structured, organise

That’s a very opinionated view from someone who’s actually read the book. I thought the whole thing was about having a plan, and many well structured, organised teams; having a 10x programmer makes no difference at all without the rest of the things; no matter how great you are, you can’t do everything, and if you try, you’ll become a bottleneck. I sympathise very much with wanting to staple “do you actually have a plan for how that’s going to work?” to someone in a planning meeting. > Very good professional programmers are ten times as productive as poor ones, at same training and two-year experience level. (Sackman, Grant, and Erickson) > Sackman, Grant, and Erickson's data showed no correlation whatsoever between experience and performance. I doubt the universality of that result. > A small sharp team is too slow for really big systems. ^ literally a quotes from the book.