3 ms·
Not trying to be mean, but it's like when someone who doesn't understand the point of the feature implements it.
by kzrdude 5y ago
Not trying to be mean, but it's like when someone who doesn't understand the point of the feature implements it.
- cryptonector 5y agoI don't understand your point; I'm not sure why.
- djbusby 5y agoI think they mean that your up-thread (is that OP or GP or?) comment is asking for the wrong thing. Like one of those XY type problems
- kzrdude 5y agoI always underestimate how easy it is to be misunderstood. Why it's worthwhile to spend time on clear communication! I'm chiding SQLite, a bit unfairly, that they only implemented the strict feature half right, still leaving some type coercion in.
- cryptonector 5y agoThanks, I understand your point now, and I agree. The SQLite3 devs seem to think that because other SQL RDBMSes do this, they should too. At this time I'm of the opinion that more strictness is better.
- kiwijamo 5y agoWhich other SQL engines do this? The ones I'm familiar with (MySQL, PostgreSQL, Microsoft SQL, Orcale to name a few) certainly don't behave anywhere close to how SQLite behaves.