> The public accusation is vague and is not substantiated. You're confused about what the public accusation is. It's not about whatever shitty thing someone on

> The public accusation is vague and is not substantiated. You're confused about what the public accusation is. It's not about whatever shitty thing someone on the core team originally did; it's about process and structure. Their complaint was that the moderation team can't moderate the core team, because the latter claims not to be under the purview of the former. Does that really need further "substantiation"? And what's "vague" about it? And no, the details of the original shitty thing don't matter; the same (lack of?) process and structure would apply to any such incident involving one or more members of the core team. (How can any of this be so hard to understand???)