4 ms·
CORRECTION: But not with our proven Red Hat Linux, then it's 4x cheaper than to manage a Mac, many things happened since 2016. (Disclaimer IBM Manager here..
by nix23 5y ago
CORRECTION:
But not with our proven Red Hat Linux, then it's 4x cheaper than to manage a Mac, many things happened since 2016.
(Disclaimer IBM Manager here...Not)
- rbanffy 5y agoI would not be surprised that, with all the fleet management tooling we have for servers, that it wouldn't be cheaper and simpler to manage a fleet of Linux machines with unprivileged users. A lot of problems on Windows (and Macs) is with programs the user decided to install.
- nix23 5y agoWell it was meant as a joke, but yes your are probably right, and a windows machine should never allow users to install anything...NO especially not devs ;) PS: Don't forget to update your vm/370-image to CE 1.1 ;) http://www.vm370.org/vm http://www.vm370.org/vm
- rbanffy 5y agoWhen I developed software for Windows, I had two machines on two different networks, on one I could read e-mails, file expenses, and so on. On the other, I was a local administrator. I had access to the internet through a proxy that blocked some websites (so, for instance, I wouldn't be able to look at patents) and nothing else.