3 ms·
This reminds me of a slide I saw at some talk. It was presented as a totem pole, and your goal is to move up on the pole. It was called the "TKVP Totem Pole", f
by danbmil99 5y ago
This reminds me of a slide I saw at some talk. It was presented as a totem pole, and your goal is to move up on the pole. It was called the "TKVP Totem Pole", from bottom to top:
Vision
Product
Knowledge
Time
What do you get paid for on this stack? IF you are selling your time by the hour (and billing honestly) you are at the bottom of the pole -- T.
The next step up is to be paid more for your knowledge (wisdom, expertise) than for your time.
P is for product: at this point, we are talking about a startup, rather than a role at a company. At the base of things, most viable startups grow out of the experience of spending time and applying knowledge to customer's problems. When you find yourself (say as a consultant, or even job-hopping every 1.5 years) solving the same puzzles again and again, you might start to think about automating, consolidating, productizing these patterns and selling them to customers as a product or service. Even an IC at a FAANG can do this by, for example, convincing their manager to open-source useful utilities. Guess what -- now you can re-use that code at your next job!
At the top of the totem pole is Vision. That is where (as a startup founder) you sell the vision of what your product/service could become, if you had some rocket fuel in the form of capital and networking support.
Of course this climb is not for everyone to take solo. As a talented IC, you may decide that instead of the safety of a FAANG job, you might consider throwing your chips in with a startup that has ascended this ladder to somewhere between P and V. Just make sure you get an equity package that fairly compensates you for the career risk you are taking.
- Silhouette 5y agoThat's an interesting perspective but I suspect it fits reality better if the P and V levels are in moonshot startup territory. If you have the skills and knowledge to be successful at those levels, your product/vision is something good, but you're operating in a smaller market without huge amounts of investment funding, you might still make more money and sometimes exert more influence being at level K but working with clients who are already established in larger markets and in need of wiser and more knowledgeable input to grow further. Think of a rapid growth scale-up where most of the technical staff are relatively inexperienced or a multinational spinning up a new division that wants to build a solid foundation for its next big thing. The right technical advice and strategic leadership can be worth a fortune in that kind of environment.
- maximp 5y agoI read this comment a few days ago, and it really stuck with me. I'm so curious where this comes from - would you happen to remember the talk, or where I could read about this concept?
- danbmil99 5y agotbh, I made it up. Thought it would sound more authoritative if credited to an anonymous source. Someday I may try to publish something about the idea. Feel free to spread it around.
- maximp 5y agoHa! For what it's worth, as an internet stranger, I would have been just as likely to read if you simply said "I have this theory" and laid out the same thing. Either way, thanks for sharing, and let me know if you publish anything about this!