> Because when you have a hammer, everything tends to look like a nail and when you have TensorFlow, everything tends to look like an ML problem. And if you ha

> Because when you have a hammer, everything tends to look like a nail and when you have TensorFlow, everything tends to look like an ML problem. And if you have billions of dollars in cheap capital, everything looks like an investment problem. Which is ultimately the suggestion of this article: "Why aren't you more like Wall Street?" The implications are exactly the opposite of Zillow being an innovative company. If they require billions of dollars in deep pockets (nbd) and a restructuring of their org to be more like old-school operators, all signs point to existing players as more fundamentally correct about the strategy required to succeed in the space.