4 ms·
Not what I said or meant at all. I’m arguing about the proper use of the “intelligence” noun here. Does this really show a “capacity for abstraction, logic, und
by Ecco 5y ago
Not what I said or meant at all. I’m arguing about the proper use of the “intelligence” noun here. Does this really show a “capacity for abstraction, logic, understanding, self-awareness, learning, emotional knowledge, reasoning, planning, creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving. ”(Wikipedia)? I don’t think so. All I see here is a simple list of steps that a machine keeps on repeating.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- NamTaf 5y agoWe have used "AI" to denote the computer player in games for as long as I've been alive, and I'm pushing my late 30s. This is not new ground, and I'm a bit surprised you're choosing this hill to make your stand. e: This is precisely why there's the distinction of "artificial general intelligence"
- kzrdude 5y agoIt's not strange, it's precisely because AI is used as a term everywhere now, that we should be skeptical of using it that way.
- NavinF 5y ago“Everywhere now”? The title’s usage of “AI” has been common even before my parents were born: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_in_video_games https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_in_v...
- H8crilA 5y agoYou're right. In my little joke I implied something else than you said. It's a low/middle complexity piece of control software.
- Vetch 5y agoThere is the intelligence required to play the game and the intelligence required to learn it. As long as the activity of playing Tetris can be labeled as relying on intelligence then the machine can be labeled as an excised expression of said intelligence.