> Fair enough, but what are you going to do? Isolate them away from the population. We've already started to mandate vaccination for work in many places in US,

> Fair enough, but what are you going to do? Isolate them away from the population. We've already started to mandate vaccination for work in many places in US, mask mandates, etc. If the area gets hot enough, then we lock down. We've been doing it already. We can't force anyone to take the vaccine but we don't have to accept them. Why do you think there has been so many protests in US and other countries because of the said mask/vaccine mandates? Everyone's action has consequences, choosing not to get vaccinated does not mean they should be free from any consequences; their consequences are the isolation policies. > If the hospitals need to set limits to ensure balanced distribution of resources - the unvaccinated should be alerted and then the “hospital rationing” begins. They already have and not only that, they're losing a lot of hospital staff as well. A lot of hospitals have stopped or postponed surgeries, dealing with long lines of people in the ERs waiting a long time. Remember, hospitals have the duty to save everyone, they should never be in the situation where they should start to deny help to everyone coming into ER. The whole point of the original lockdowns was to "flatten the curve" where the hospitals can serve everyone as they come in.