4 ms·
Then the author meant normal vision, not normal people. In fact, the author already happily corrected themselves — forty-five minutes before you chimed in!
by chownie 5y ago
Then the author meant normal vision, not normal people. In fact, the author already happily corrected themselves — forty-five minutes before you chimed in!
- bruce343434 5y agoSo how would you have preferred it to be phrased? "people with normal vision" or "normal visioned people"? vs the more terse "normal people" for which the context of vision can be easily inferred.
- chownie 5y agoProbably "people with normal vision", because it's the typicality of the person's visual acuity that's topical, not that person's normality.