>Wow, one of these is super old 2015 is super old? >and does not really say what you write it does to quote the letter: Since 2009, however, more estimates

>Wow, one of these is super old 2015 is super old? >and does not really say what you write it does to quote the letter: Since 2009, however, more estimates of the economic impact of climate change have been published. These new results do affect the fitted trend, but not in the way suggested by Mr Ward. The new trend shows positive impacts for warming up to about two degrees global warming, just like the old trend did. The new trend, however, shows markedly less negative impacts for more profound warming than did the old trend. In other words, in the last five years, we have become less pessimistic about the impacts of climate change. How is this not what I said?