This take floats on the assumption that the writers want those that aren't a "good enough cog" replaced. Perhaps the writers want those that react inappropriat

This take floats on the assumption that the writers want those that aren't a "good enough cog" replaced. Perhaps the writers want those that react inappropriately negatively to situations get help in order to both improve the efficiency of the system and for the individual's healing? This and other similar takes in the comments section seem to just be anxious projections. Do we really think the authors want to watch the world to burn, or is it more likely they want to help everyone in reality?